NA-NA, NA-NA, BOO-BOO, THE ACCURACY OF YOUR PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEFS IS DOO-DOO

The paper argues that adopting a form of skepticism, Skeptical-Dogmatism, recommends disbelieving each philosophical position in many multi-proposition disputes- disputes where there are three or more contrary views-leads to higher ratio true false beliefs than the “average philosopher” (as indicated by survey data). Hence, Skeptical-Dogmatists have accurate average philosopher. As corollary, most philosophers would improve accuracy their if they adopted Skeptical-Dogmatism.